NLPWESSEX, natural law publishing | nlpwessex.org |
Solar Breakthrough
From 21st Century Organic Polymers
'Solar Panels Too Pricey? Try Printing Them Out'
www.nlpwessex.org/docs/solarbreakthrough.htm
Future Of The Genuinely Sustainable Electric Car
Moves Big Step Closer
But Only If 'Big Oil', 'Detroit', And Biofuel
Vested Interests
Will Allow The Death Of The 19th Century Born Internal Combustion Engine
In Their Hands Lies Much Of The Future Of World Peace
July 2007
"Imagine some day driving in your hybrid car with a solar panel painted on the roof, which is producing electricity to drive the engine. The opportunities are endless."
Lead researcher Somenath Mitra, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Solar panels too pricey? Try printing them out
MSNBC, 23 July 2007
2007 SOLAR
TECHNOLOGY BREAKTHROUGH Crucial to a positive outcome in this process is a phase transition in individual and global collective thinking. |
"U.S. scientists have developed a
technology to produce inexpensive solar cells that can be painted or printed on flexible
plastic sheets. New Jersey Institute of
Technology Professor Somenath Mitra said
the process is so simple, even homeowners will someday be able to print sheets of the
solar cells with inexpensive home-based inkjet printers and then attach the product to a
wall or roof to create their own power stations. Purified silicon, also used for making
computer chips, is a core material for fabricating conventional solar cells, Mitra said.
However, the processing of a material such as purified silicon is beyond the reach of most
consumers. 'Developing organic solar cells from polymers, however, is a cheap and
potentially simpler alternative,' he said. 'We
foresee a great deal of interest in our work because solar cells can be inexpensively
printed or simply painted on exterior building walls and-or roof tops. Imagine some day driving in your hybrid car with a solar panel painted on the roof, which is producing electricity to drive the engine. The
opportunities are endless.' Mitra and his team reported the research in the June 21 issue of the Journal of Materials Chemistry."
Inexpensive solar cell technology created
United
Press International, 19 July 2007
'Solar Panels Too Pricey? Try Printing Them Out'
MSNBC Solar panels too pricey? Try printing them out Scientists capture sun energy with printouts; consumers can stick on walls By Tuan C. Nguyen LiveScience Updated: 2:30 p.m. ET July 23, 2007 Someday, homeowners might need only
inkjet printers to harvest solar energy. Then, sunlight can activate a process
in which the nanotubes, behaving like copper wires, will run collected solar energy
converted to electrical current to power household appliances like your microwave. © 2007 LiveScience.com. All rights reserved. |
It's Time To Boost The Prospects For World Peace
By Abandoning The Internal Combustion Engine
This Archaic Piece Of 19th Century Technology Is The Biggest Waster Of Energy
And Provoker Of Resource Wars Ever Devised By Man
".... energy efficiency is so
important. More than half the energy we generate every day is wasted. In an average car, about 20 per cent of every
unit of petrol goes into moving a car forward, the rest is lost as heat."
Jeroen van der Veer, Chief executive of Royal Dutch
Shell
High hopes and hard truths dictate future
London
Times, 25 June 2007
Based On The Superior Efficiency Of Electric Motors Below
Are Some Of The Benefits Of Moving Away From The Internal Combustion Engine
Even When The Electricity Used Still Comes From Oil Burned At Power Stations As
Part Of An Intermediate Stage In The Transition To Non-Fossil Fuel Energy Sources
So Just Imagine What The Additional Benefits Will Be Later On
When Solar Power Replaces Oil And Other Fossil Fuels As The Original Source Of
Energy
"R. James Woolsey, CIA Director during
the 90s, wrote an editorial in the Wall Street Journal last December talking about
the national security advantages of ending the US dependence on imported oil. He described
the dramatic reduction of oil imports and greenhouse gas emissions that will happen if
transit combustion is moved from the street to power plants. A week later, GM rolled out
the Volt concept car at the Detroit Auto Show. It will be powered by the plug-in hybrid
electric drive train that Mr. Woolsey was advocating. Since electricity costs one third of
what we currently spend on gasoline to power cars and recharging would be done overnight,
it was apparent to Mr. Woolsey that widespread adoption of plug-in electric drive
technology would be practical, particularly since 84%
of the 220 million cars on the road in the US can be replaced by plug-in electric cars, having equivalent performance and amenities to the fuel powered cars we
drive now, without having to build additional generation and transmission infrastructure.
The only remaining bar to implementation was the need for safe and affordable high power
batteries with a vehicle lifetime service rating that werent available at that
time....there have also been technology advances this spring that indicate that
theres reason for optimism. New materials innovations that are now out of the
laboratory and going into production that, when widely adopted in the US, can cap
greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. High power, long life batteries that recharge in 10 minutes
are now being manufactured in the US that can power both fully electric plug-in vehicles
and plug-in hybrids.... It used to be that battery electric propulsion was only good for
golf carts, fork lifts, and neighborhood cars that went 30mph. But seemingly out of the
blue a private Canadian company doing business in Ontario, CA is producing a no
compromise, all electric, five passenger sport utility truck (SUT) with a 130 mile range
that cruises at highway speeds with the air conditioner running. Theyre being
marketed to fleet operators to whom they makes great good sense. Using a high power
charger, the batteries 'fill up' in ten minutes (or over night from a 220 V outlet using
the onboard charger). Phoenix Motorcars will introduce an extended range SUV later this
year to accommodate families.... The Phoenix SUV has performance thats comparable to
a Ford Escape Hybrid (0-60 in less than 10 seconds vs. the Ford at 10.3 seconds). If electricity costs ten cents per kWh, charging the Phoenix will
cost $7.00 to go 260 miles. Even getting 34mpg which is great for an SUV, with gas at
three dollars per gallon it costs $23.00 to travel that distance in the Ford over 3
times more. And thats only half of the savings
story - the maintenance profile of battery electric
vehicles is 25% of the most durable internal combustion configurations. How can that be? Well, for openers, the motor has only one moving part.
And then theres no:
- Transmission to flush or fluid to change
- Cooling system to flush or fluid to change
- Lubrication system or oil & filter to change
- Ignition system to tune or air filter and spark plugs to change
- Exhaust system to rust out or EGR components to maintain
- Fan or fan belts or timing belts to replace
- Front break wear (regenerative breaking instead)
- Lead acid battery to replace (Phoenix batteries last 250,000 miles)
If youre a fleet operator, the reduced maintenance translates into increased
availability that means you need fewer electric vehicles to keep the required number in
service for some fleets that means close to half as many. A 260 mile per day range
will get most people where theyre going so much of the time and saves them so much
money that renting the right vehicle for extended trips is perfect. But plug-in hybrid
cars being planned by GM and Toyota will be able to go 650 miles with the combination of a
less costly battery and a gas tank."
Unrealized benefits of transport electrification are within reach
Energy Bulletin, 1 July 2007
Imagine Reducing Global Demand For Oil By Half Through This Kind Of Efficiency
"Even though the battery problems
appear to have been solved, widespread adoption of plug-in transit is not assured while it
threatens oil company profits. Compared to a Prius
(45mpg), an electric power plant burns one half of the oil and emits one third of the carbon dioxide (well to wheel) per mile to
power a Phoenix SUV. (11) Plug-in hybrid and battery
electric sedans comparable to the Prius will be even more efficient and that means if they
become popular we will use a lot less oil. Its within our technical and
manufacturing ability to convert enough of the cars in the US to plug-in electric
transport to cut oil utilization by half or more in
the next decade about the amount we now
import. This is coming just in time; some estimates show world oil
production peaking in 10 years. Aside from doubling the time it will take to deplete oil supplies,
the impact on international politics and economics would be something to see."
Unrealized benefits of transport electrification are within reach
Energy Bulletin, 1 July 2007
And Then Gradually Replacing The Remaining Oil Input With This
"Scientists have invented a plastic solar cell that can turn the sun's power into electrical energy, even on a cloudy day. The plastic material uses nanotechnology and contains the first solar cells able to harness the sun's invisible, infrared rays. The breakthrough has led theorists to predict that plastic solar cells could one day become
five times more efficient than current solar cell technology. Like paint, the composite can be sprayed onto other materials and used as portable electricity. A sweater coated in the material could power a cell phone or other wireless devices. A hydrogen-powered car painted with the film could potentially convert enough energy into electricity to continually recharge the car's battery. The researchers envision that one day 'solar farms' consisting of the plastic material could be rolled across deserts to generate enough clean energy to supply the entire planet's power needs. 'The sun that reaches the Earth's surface delivers 10,000 times more energy than we consume,' said Ted Sargent, an electrical and computer engineering professor at the University of Toronto. Sargent is one of the inventors of the new plastic material. 'If we could cover 0.1 percent of the Earth's surface with [very efficient] large-area solar cells,' he said,'we could in principle replace all of our energy habits with a source of power which is clean and renewable.'... Other possibilities include energy-saving plastic sheeting that could be unfurled onto a rooftop to supply heating needs, or solar cell window coating that could let in enough infrared light to power home appliances....Ultimately, a large amount of the sun's energy could be harnessed through 'solar farms' and used to power all our energy needs, the researchers predict. 'This could potentially displace other sources of electrical production that produce greenhouse gases, such as coal,' Sargent said.... The biggest hurdle facing solar power is cost-effectiveness. At a current cost of 25 to 50 cents per kilowatt-hour, solar power is significantly more expensive than conventional electrical power for residences. Average U.S. residential power prices are less than ten cents per kilowatt-hour, according to experts. But that could change with the new material. 'Flexible, roller-processed solar cells have the potential to turn the sun's power into a clean, green, convenient source of energy,' said John Wolfe, a nanotechnology venture capital investor at Lux Capital in New York City. "So It's Time To Challenge The Vested Interests And Put
Billions Of Dollars Into Solar Energy And Electric Vehicles
Instead Of Futilely Wasting Billions Of Taxpayers Money In Iraq And Other Energy
Resource Conflict Zones Just To Keep The Internal Combustion Engine Going
After All - The Oil Run Internal Combustion Engine Is Just So 19th Century!
Because If We Don't The Alternative Is This
"Oil ruled the 20th century; the
shortage of oil will rule the 21st.... Last Tuesday the lead story in
The Financial Times was the latest report from the International Energy Agency. The FT
quoted the IEA as saying: 'Oil looks extremely tight in five years time,' and that
there are 'prospects of even tighter natural gas markets at the turn of the decade'. For
an international agency, that is inflammatory language.... 27 of the 51
oil-producing nations listed in BPs Statistical Review of World Energy reported
output declines in 2006. One projection of world crude oil production actually forecasts a
10 per cent reduction in total world output between 2005 and 2015. That would be a
revolution..... Some analysts think that the peak oil moment has already been reached; some still think that it will not come
until 2020 which is itself only 12 years away. Market trends and the statistics
both support the IEAs view that consumption is accelerating and supplies falling
faster than expected. Of course, if the 'crunch' point is only five years away for
oil, and closer for natural gas, it has, for practical purposes, already arrived....The
shortage of oil and natural gas, relative to demand, had already changed the balance of
world power. Historians may well conclude that the US
decision to invade Iraq was primarily motivated by the desire to gain physical control of Iraqs oil and to provide defence
support to other Middle Eastern oil powers.
Political motivations are always mixed, but oil is an essential national interest of the
United States. If the US is now deciding to withdraw
from Iraq, the price will have
to be paid in terms of loss of access to oil.... The
world is coming to the end of the age of oil, which produced its own technology, its
balance of power, its own economy, its pattern of society. It does not greatly matter
whether the oil supply has peaked already or is going to peak in five or 12 years
time. There is a huge adjustment to be made. There will be some benefits, including higher efficiencies and perhaps a
better approach to global warming. But nothing will take us back towards the innocent
expectation of indefinite expansion of the first months of the new millennium."
Lord William Rees-Mogg
Are these the last days of the Oil Age?
London Times, 16 July 2007
"Competing
energy needs are the greatest source of potential conflict between the United States and
China, Senator Joe Lieberman says. In remarks to the Council on Foreign Relations December
1, the Connecticut Democrat, a member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs Committee, said the United States and China must work together to meet both
countries' energy needs. '[I]t is time the U.S. and China not only recognize the similarity of our oil dependency status, and the direction that competition may take us, but begin to talk more
directly about this growing global competition for
oil so that we can each develop national policies
and cooperative international policies -- even joint research and development projects -- to cut our dependency on oil before the competition becomes truly
hostile,' he said. The senator urged the expansion
of the U.S.-China Energy Policy Dialogue established in 2004 to encourage the development of alternative fuels and vehicles that are powered
by energy sources other than gasoline. He also
encouraged China to join the International Energy Agency (IEA), saying: '[A]llowing
China to stay out of the IEA and the global effort to deal with energy problems makes no
sense when you look at it in light of our shared economic and security needs.' According
to Lieberman, China's increasing demand for oil has led it to take some questionable
actions such as negotiating energy contracts with Iran and Sudan that 'not only would we
not consider because of our values,' but that also make China 'an ally of nations that are
openly hostile towards us.'" As Hot And
Dangerous As The Nuclear Arms Race Between The "Today I want to discuss what I
believe is one of the biggest sources of potential friction between the U.S. and the PRC
(People's Republic of China) - that is our global
competition for oil. The U.S. and China are now the
world's number one and two consumers of oil respectively, with China's need growing as
rapidly as its economy is. This could lead to Sino-American confrontations over oil that
could in the years ahead threaten national security and global security unless each of our
nations -- two great nations -- develop and employ new technologies that will reduce their
dependence on oil.... What I want to say today is it is time the U.S. and China not only
recognize the similarity of our oil dependency status, and the direction that competition
may take us, but begin to talk more directly about this growing global competition for oil
so that we can each develop national policies and cooperative international policies --
even joint research and development projects -- to
cut our dependency on oil before the competition becomes truly hostile. The U.S.-China energy engagement that I foresee could be, in one sense,
the 21st Century version of what arms control negotiations with the Soviet Union were in
the last century. But we've got to start those
discussions before the race for oil becomes as hot and
dangerous as the nuclear arms race between the US and the Soviet Union did in the last century.... China's
oil consumption surpassed Japan's in 2003. It is now at 6.5 million barrels per day. By
2025, demand, as I said before, is projected to more than double to more than 14.2 million
barrels per day. If we do nothing, the United States demand for oil by that same year 2025
will increase 8.7 million barrels -- a 40 percent increase to about 28 million barrels a
day. As the authors of the IEA report say -- and here I quote -- 'we are ending up with 95 percent of the world relying for its
economic well-being on decisions made by five or six countries in the Middle East'.... The fact is that history tells us that wars have been fought over
such competitions for natural resources. In fact, as you all know, exactly such a
competition is one of the factors that led to Pearl Harbor and World War II. For the good
of our nation and global stability, we've got to lead America into a new energy age by
transforming our transportation system because it is there that we consume 70 percent of
our demand for oil." |
".... the
implications of China's exploding thirst for crude oil are epic in scope... Based on our
analysis of the intense economic, crude oil, and military confrontations developing among
the China Rim regions largest economies, we believe that the most aggressive crude oil price
targets calling for $100 per barrel within the next three years will prove to be
conservative.... it is our
opinion that the 'likely direction of surprise' in crude oil prices will continue to be to
the upside.... There is not just one new economic behmoth
emerging in the China Rim region, there are two... The simultaneous economic rise of China
and India will have a huge impact on worldwide crude oil markets.... The rapid and simultaneous rise of at least two behmoth economies, China and India, comes at time when the world's
oil production appears poised to peak.
A sustained upward move in crude oil prices is likely to create drilling economics that
will favor the exploitation of reserves that were previously
uneconomical to tap. However, the
marginal increase in reserves that might result is unlikely, in our view, to substantially
offset the crude oil impact of an eventual worldwide 'peak' in crude oil production...While China's economic rise is fostering a
worldwide grab for crude oil reserves, it is also creating a 'war chest' with which China
is financing the rapid modernization of the People's Liberation Army (PLA). The PLA, in
turn, is the ultimate guarantor of China's energy security. One of the key purposes of
this analysis is to provide our research users with a 'context' or 'unified theory' for
interrelating economic, crude oil, and military developments on the China rim.... The
Laguna Research Partners Energy Security Index measures total military expenditures per
barrel of crude oil consumed. We calculate ESI for nations and regions.... These figures
lend credence to our view that the US is currently critical to the energy security of both
India and Russia - in defence of sea lanes and oil fields, respectively - vis-a-vis China... Our ... calculations show that China and
the United States make estimated non-core military expenditures of US $47.01 AND US $42.38
per barrel of crude oil imported, respectively...[Japan, South Korea, India and Taiwan] have been
beneficiaries of the US energy security umbrella. China's economic, crude oil, and
military emergence, though, is prompting all of these leading China Rim crude oil
importers to implement increasingly aggressive defence postures... From a short-term
standpoint, worldwide crude oil demand is continuing to expand, but the world's crude oil production infrastructure is
running at 'near full' capacity. From a long-term perspective, major new China Rim
region buyers of crude oil - China and India - are emerging during a period when worldwide
crude oil is approaching a peak. Meaningful new crude oil demand from Brazil will likely
add to demand-side pressures during this critical 'peak oil' transition..."
Crisis on the China Rim: An
Economic, Crude Oil, and Military Analysis
Laguna Research
Partners, 14 April 2005
Who Are Laguna Research Partners? - Click Here
Download Full 85 Page Report - Click Here
Meanwhile Here Is The Latest Announcement From The Dolts
At
'The Ministry Of Proping Up The 19th Century Oil Fueled
Internal Combustion Engine With Your Taxes'
Another £4 Billion Down The Drain!
'A Step Change In More Unintelligent Government'
It's The Oil Stupid!
"Orders for two new Royal Navy
aircraft carriers have been confirmed by Defence Secretary Des Browne. He said the £3.8bn contract would
lead to the construction of the largest vessels ever sailed by the Royal Navy. The new
65,000-tonne carriers - HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales - will enter service
in 2014 and 2016. Mr Browne said the work would support and create 10,000 jobs across the UK,
including those at yards on the Clyde, Rosyth, Portsmouth and Barrow. The contract was
described as a 'major project' for the shipbuilding industry by Prime Minister Gordon
Brown....Making the announcement, Mr Browne said the carriers would 'provide our
front-line forces with the modern, world class capabilities they will need over the coming decades. The carriers represent a
step-change in our capabilities, enabling us to
deliver increased strategic effect and influence around the world at a time and place of
our choosing [i.e. to secure access to oil]..... "
MoD confirms £3.8bn carrier order
BBC Online, 25 July 2007
So Get A Grip - Let's Roll Into The 21st Century Instead
Of Baghdad And Tehran!
What Those 10,000 Tax-Burning Aircraft Carrier Fitters Should Be Doing Instead
If There Was Any Semblance Of Coherent Political Leadership Left In The 'Civilised'
World
'Irrefutable Business
Case' 'Energy Update', January 2007 |
Why Prolonging The Moribund Life Of The Internal
Combustion Engine Through Biofuels Is A Major Strategic Error
And Why Hollywood Star George Clooney Is Going Down A Different Route
Click
Here
The Intelligent Future Is Solar
Natural Law's Greatest Powerhouse For The Earth
"Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev on
Wednesday urged the world's biggest industrialised nations to set up a 50-billion-dollar
(44-billion-euro) fund to support solar power, warning that oil or nuclear energy were not viable energy sources for
the future. Gorbachev -- who chairs an environmental thinktank, Green Cross International
-- called on leaders of the Group of Eight (G8) industrialised nations to invest in
renewable energy sources, in a statement marking the 20th anniversary of the Chernobyl
nuclear disaster.....Rising oil prices and supply concerns, as well as the growing need to
combat global warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions, have raised the profile and
economic viability of some renewable energy sources."
Gorbachev urges G8 to back solar power
Agence France Presse, 26
April 2006
"Humanitys 'primary energy
production,' including all fossil fuels, nuclear power, hydroelectric and renewables, is
13 terawatts (equivalent to 13,000 large power plants), less than 1/100 of 1 percent of
the 170,000 terawatts continuously delivered to the earth as sunlight. With 600 terawatts
of terrestrial potential, solar energy far exceeds all other possible forms of
substitution..... A direct path from sunlight to electricity can be 10 times as efficient
as photosynthesis. Solar energy cant be touched or put into a bottle. Solar is radiant energy, not a solid, liquid or gas. Electricity from
renewables is ideally suited for urban transportation. It is nonpolluting and well-suited
for fixed guide rail and automated routing of traffic, and an
electric vehicle is at least twice as efficient as a gasoline vehicle. We are ready for a good reason to get rid of the internal combustion
engine in dense urban areas, where it is about as practical as a campfire in the kitchen. Efficiency in the face of oil depletion is that compelling reason. Solar technologies continue to improve, and so do electric vehicles. A battery with three times the energy density of lead-acid and a
charging time under two minutes is scheduled for introduction in 2007 or 2008."
Dawn of the Solar Era - A Wake-Up Call
Solar Today, March/April
2006
".... you're not going to be
self-sufficient, or even produce half of our energy from biomass in the U.S., if we want
to eat.... The difficulty is that plants do not collect very much solar energy. On
average, plants collect one-tenth of one percent of the solar energy available. Photovoltaic solar cells collect at least 10 percent, which means
100 times the energy collected by plants. Biofuel
Skeptic Extraordinaire.... When these people talk about biofuels providing us with our
energy, they need to look at the facts right now. Eighteen percent of all corn is going
into ethanol production. We're getting 4.5 million gallons of ethanol. That's 1 percent of
U.S. petroleum use. It's 1 percent. If we use 100 percent of U.S. corn, and we won't do
that, but if we used 100 percent, what would that do for us? Six percent."
Professor David Pimentel, Cornell University
Biofuel Skeptic Extraordinaire
Grist, 8 December 2006
NLPWESSEX,
natural law publishing |