Michael Maloof On US Covert Support
For Islamic Mujahadeen In Balkans And Caucasus


Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin is an online subscription intelligence news service from the creator of WorldNetDaily.com which describes Farah as a journalist "who has been developing sources around the world for almost 30 years". In the G2 Bulletin of 25 September 2006 Michael Maloof, a former senior official at the Department of Defense during  the Clinton and Bush administrations, wrote about Clinton's post-cold war covert support for Islamic mujahadeen in Chechnya. Other reports indicate that these would have been part of the United State's clandestine efforts to destabilise former Yugoslavia and the Caucasus in liason with Pakistan's secret intelligence service, the ISI. And, as usual, such efforts appear to have been secretly supported by the United Kingdom.


"The Clinton administration followed up by providing strong support to the KLA, even though it was known that the KLA supported the Muslim mujahadeen. Despite that knowledge, then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright had the KLA removed from the State Department list of terrorists. This action paved the way for the United States to provide the KLA with needed logistical support. At the same time, the KLA also received support from Iran and Usama bin Laden, along with 'Islamic holy warriors' who were jihad veterans from Bosnia, Chechnya and Afghanistan. Swiss journalist Richard Labeviere, in his book, 'Dollars for Terror,' said that the international Islamic networks linked to bin Laden received help from U.S. intelligence community. Indeed, Chechen sources claim that U.S. intelligence also aided them in their opposition to Russia. Given that U.S. policy in the post-Cold War period has not only been anti-Russian but anti-Iranian, the United States worked closely with Pakistan's predominantly Sunni Inter-Services Intelligence organization. Through ISI, the United States recruited Sunni mujahadeen by staging them in Chechnya to fight in Bosnia and later in Kosovo."
F. Michael Maloof, Post 9/11 Pentagon Counterterrorism Adviser
Iran subversion in Balkans
G2 Bulletin, 25 September 2006

"This is the same [CIA] crowd that worked with the mujahideen in Bosnia."
The Dark Side - Interview F. Michael Maloof
PBS Frontline, 2006


Who Is F. Michael Maloof?

"A few weeks after 9/11, Michael Maloof, then with the Pentagon's Technology Security Operations, got a phone call inviting him to join the Pentagon's Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group (PCTEG), set up under Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith to examine raw intelligence on the terrorist threat and make recommendations ... This is an edited transcript of an interview conducted on Jan. 10, 2006."
The Dark Side - Interview F.Michael Maloof
PBS Frontline, 2006

"Since the start of the Iraq war, Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the weekly online intelligence newsletter, has been bringing subscribers facts and insight they can't get anywhere else. ... WND senior staff writer Michael Maloof, a former senior security-policy analyst in the Office of the Secretary of Defense with almost 30 years of federal service in the U.S. Defense Department and as a specialized trainer for border guards and Special Forces in select countries of the Caucasus and Central Asia, files reports several times a week utilizing his worldwide sources developed throughout his distinguished careers in journalism and national security. In between working at the U.S. Senate and the Defense Department, Maloof was a special correspondent for the Detroit News, a reporter for a specialized newsletter at U.S. News & World Report and Washington correspondent for the Union Leader in Manchester, N.H. While with the Department of Defense, Maloof was director of Technology Security Operations as head of a 10-person team involved in halting the diversion of militarily critical technologies to countries of national security and proliferation concern and those involved in sponsoring terrorism. His office was the liaison to the intelligence and enforcement community in halting diversions and using cases that developed from them as early warnings to decision-makers of potential policy issues. He is a recipient of the Defense Department's Distinguished Civilian Service Award. Due to his specialized background, Maloof was assigned under a congressionally mandated Defense Department-U.S. Customs non-proliferation program to provide specialized training in combat tracking to border guards in Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan to deal with the increasing influx of terrorists into those countries........ Following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Maloof was detailed back to the Office of the Secretary of Defense to prepare analysis of worldwide terrorist networks, determine their linkages worldwide and their relationship to state sponsors. Prior to his career at the Defense Department, Maloof was a legislative assistant to various U.S. senators specializing in national security and international affairs. 'There are very few people in the world as qualified as Michael Maloof to provide insightful intelligence reports and analysis to the American public,' says Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of the news agency.'"
Your own personal global intelligence briefing
WordNetDaily, 28 November 2011

Michael Maloof

Michael Maloof is a former US government senior security policy analyst who became a member of the Pentagon's Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group after 9/11. He was hired by Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith to find links between Saddam Hussein and terrorist networks, a concern which Maloof thought was a stronger argument against Iraq than weapons of mass destruction.

In an interview 19 January 2006 he told PBS that "never did they [the Iraqis] have a program constituted and operational that we could determine .... I thought it [the National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002] was flawed. It basically talked about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. I just didn't see it, and I wrote a memo up to my boss saying this is not correct .... Until August of 2002, we were talking about terror as the basis [on which] to deal with Iraq .... To this day I don't know what prompted their [CIA's] October 2002 report. It's something they did on their own ... What changed between August and October of 2002? What happened? To this day I don't have it."

Maloof has also claimed in the Washington Times that "the CIA rejected a Syrian initiative months prior to U.S. action in Iraq to present Saddam Hussein's unconditional terms. Once rejected, the CIA then subverted an eleventh-hour Syrian initiative to present the same terms to U.S. policymakers through my office." (this claim would appear to be supported by a report published by Knight Ridder, 5 November 2003). However, a more recent account from Maloof of US actions during the Clinton administration are just as interesting, and return us to the issue of America's longstanding covert relationship with Pakistan's ISI.

Maloof has become an open critic of the Bush administration's conduct of the 'war on terror' after losing his security clearances during an episode of intelligence community infighting. Contrary to Bush administration policy Maloof has advocated, as he wrote in the Washington Times 13 September 2006, more dialogue with Syria in order to "prevent a larger explosion in the Middle East". His office at the Department of Defense handled an approach by Damascus for such purposes prior to the invasion of Iraq which was rejected by the Bush administration. In Maloof's view "Because the U.S. fixated on driving the Syrians from Lebanon, Iran quickly filled the power vacuum through its Hezbollah proxy. When you look at it, the net effect of U.S. policy from Iraq to Lebanon has been to enhance Iran's Shi'ite role."

In a previous article for the Washington Times, 9 October 2005, Maloof drew attention to the Pentagon's 'Able Danger' data mining programme which he described as an "open-source analysis that reportedly revealed hijacker Mohamed Atta as a potential terrorist before the [9/11] attack." Maloof claimed the 9/11 attacks could have been prevented using data mining techniques and advocated more investment in such programmes (in September 2006 a controversial internal Pentagon investigation rejected claims that Able Danger had identified Atta prior to 9/11).

"On the eve of the war, Saddam Hussein offered 'a quite astonishing proposal', as Richard Perle, member of the Pentagon’s Defence Planning Board, put it. Iraq no longer had WMD. The US could 'send 2,000 FBI agents to look at whatever they wanted'. It was prepared to immediately hand over Abdur Rehman Yasin, indicted in the 1993 WTC bombings, who bore a $ 25 million reward for his capture. Polls would be held within two years. Iraq offered cooperation in fighting terrorism and 'full support for any US plan' in the peace process in Palestine. He also promised the US 'first priority as it relates to Iraq oil, mining rights' and cooperation with US strategic interests in the region. There would be 'direct US involvement on the ground in disarming Iraq'. The offer was made by the Chief of Operations of Iraq’s Intelligence Services, Hassan el-Obeidi, and confirmed by its Director, Tahir Jalil Habbush Al-Takriti, with Saddam Hussein’s backing. The middleman was a Lebanese-American businessman, Imad Hage, who contacted Michael Maloof of an intelligence unit in the Pentagon. The CIA told Perle, 'Tell them that we shall see them in Baghdad.'"
No time to talk
Hindustan Times, 15 January 2007


DEEP BACKGROUND
Iran subversion in Balkans
KLA support gives Tehran foothold in Europe
Click here to read this story

Original Source page:
@ 'G2 Bulletin'
http://g2.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=1128

Referring pages:
@ 'Allah's Willing Executioners'
http://searchlight-germany.blogspot.com/2006/09/iran-subversion-in-balkans.html

@ American Council For Kosovo
http://www.savekosovo.org/default.asp?p=4&leader=0&sp=137 (see below)


http://www.savekosovo.org/default.asp?p=4&leader=0&sp=137

DEEP BACKGROUND

Iran subversion in Balkans, KLA support
gives Tehran foothold in Europe

source: Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin

By F. Michael Maloof
Monday, 25 September 2006

Iran has been successful in supporting and extending its Shiite influence in Iraq and, most recently, in Lebanon. Now, the "Land of the Aryans" as the name Iran means has embarked on spreading its brand of Islamic radicalism into another region that threatens all of Europe: The Balkans. In the mid-1990s, Iran quietly began supporting the mujahadeen along side Osama bin Laden and Hezbollah in Bosnia. They succeeded in providing needed arms, financial support and other logistics to the Muslim militants fighting against the Serbs.

Iran and bin Laden then provided support to the Kosovo Liberation Army, which the Clinton administration also supported. Today, Iran has successfully established a strong foothold in the Serbian-controlled region of Kosovo, a Muslim enclave. There even is talk that Kosovo could become independent, a development which is meeting strong Serb resistance.

Serbia's pro-Western President, Boris Tadic, in early September 2006 visited the United States to take up this issue. Relations between the United States and Belgrade, however, remain strained due to former Bosnian-Serb president Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, his military chief, remaining at large. Both have been indicted for war crimes. Along with Bosnia, Islamic extremists in an independent Kosovo could create a base from which all of Europe could be threatened. Concern at this level was last realized when the Muslims unsuccessfully sought to sack Vienna, Austria, on September 11, 1683, the so-called first 9-11. Following this unsuccessful effort, the Muslims were forcibly pushed back into the area which today constitutes the Balkan countries. This threat of Kosovo becoming a radical Islamic base to attack the rest of Europe also is apparent to one observer who recently was in Kosovo. One activist trying to prevent Kosovo from falling into the hands of Muslim war lords told G2B: "Unfortunately, there are some in Congress who would like to see this -- even if it means creating another rogue terrorist state in the heart of the Balkans." He reported seeing a Saudi flag flying over a mosque alongside an Albanian flag. He also claims there is an Osama bin Laden mosque on Serbian soil. The spread of Iranian influence into the Balkans throughout the last decade in fact has received extensive U.S. assistance. This assistance was in the form of intelligence and logistical support which also went to Iranian and al-Qaida-backed militants. This development may have blinded U.S. policymakers to the threats of Jihad, or Holy War, that came from al-Qaida leader Usama bin Laden as early as 1998.

U.S. support for the Muslims in Bosnia also came from the person who is the new head of the Central Intelligence Agency, General Michael V. Hayden. At the time, he was director of the U.S. European Command Intelligence Directorate, based in Stuttgart, Germany. According to a Dutch government report, Hayden "had access to virtually all intelligence" from the United States, United Nations and NATO. As a result, Hayden used his intelligence unit to allow so-called "black flights" of arms to Muslim forces during the Bosnian campaign in 1995. General Hayden was aware that these arms were assisting many of the foreign mujahadeen, which also were receiving support from Iran and bin Laden. According to a Dutch intelligence report at the time, the shipments included "weapons, ammunition, uniforms, helmets, new anti-tank weapons and Stingers." These arms were said to have been dropped in Tuzla, shipped by land or air into Bosnia for the Bosnian Muslim army which included the al-Qaida-linked mujahadeen. After becoming the head of the National Security Agency in March 1999, Hayden then refused to clear the use of intelligence to halt continuing illegal shipments of arms to mujahadeen militants in the Balkans. Often, these arms were brought in discreetly by Muslim countries that were part of the United Nations peacekeeping forces sent in to prevent further violence. The arms then would go through Albania which had become a launch pad for Kosovo. The Clinton administration followed up by providing strong support to the KLA, even though it was known that the KLA supported the Muslim mujahadeen. Despite that knowledge, then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright had the KLA removed from the State Department list of terrorists. This action paved the way for the United States to provide the KLA with needed logistical support. At the same time, the KLA also received support from Iran and Usama bin Laden, along with "Islamic holy warriors" who were jihad veterans from Bosnia, Chechnya and Afghanistan. Swiss journalist Richard Labeviere, in his book, "Dollars for Terror," said that the international Islamic networks linked to bin Laden received help from U.S. intelligence community. Indeed, Chechen sources claim that U.S. intelligence also aided them in their opposition to Russia. Given that U.S. policy in the post-Cold War period has not only been anti-Russian but anti-Iranian, the United States worked closely with Pakistan's predominantly Sunni Inter-Services Intelligence organization. Through ISI, the United States recruited Sunni mujahadeen by staging them in Chechnya to fight in Bosnia and later in Kosovo. The ISI also was instrumental in the creation of Afghanistan's Taliban which gave sanctuary to Osama bin Laden and had strong ties to al-Qaida itself.

Iran and Saudi Arabia which supports many of the existing Islamic militant charities view Kosovo as pitting Islam against Christianity. Reuven Paz of Haifa University in Israel and a leading expert on radical Islamic movements said that "all of the Sunni Muslim groups as well as Iran" see Kosovo as a symbol. "As Europe tries to unite, there could be a lot more unity between the Muslims on the margins of Europe," Paz said. "There is potential that this unity could be used in a hostile way." Western officials saw the goal of the now disbanded KLA as severing Kosovo from the rest of Yugoslavia and merging it with Albania. They also saw that an Islamic Kosovo could become a bridge for an Iranian sphere of influence. It would extend from Albania to Bosnia and Macedonia which also has a significant Muslim population. The Clinton administration approach was to create an independent Muslim Kosovo. A March 22, 1998, Times of London story reported that bin Laden and Iran's Revolutionary Guards had signed a pact on Feb. 16, 1998, in Tehran consolidating their operations in Albania and Kosovo. The intention was "to turn the region into their main base for Islamic armed action in Europe." It now appears that the Bush administration is continuing the Clinton administration's approach of creating an independent Muslim Kosovo state. Following his meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and other U.S. officials in early September 2006, Serbian President Boris Tadic stated that there was an overall opinion that Kosovo should receive some kind of independence. If that turns out to be the case, the specter of an independent but Iranian-dominated Kosovo may not be far off. F. Michael Maloof is a former senior security policy analyst in the Office of the Secretary of Defense."


What Really Happened In Former Yugoslavia In The 1990s?
'US (And UK) Backed Islamic Terrorism In The Balkans' - Click Here
What Really Happened In Chechnya In The 1990s?
British And American  Covert Operations In The Caucasus - Click Here


NLPWESSEX, natural law publishing
nlpwessex.org