November 2007
Safe
In Their Hands? |
"Crops genetically modified to contain
fish oil could be fed to hens to boost the health of humans eating chicken and eggs. Scientists are working on putting omega 3 fatty acids - which help
prevent heart disease and Type 2 diabetes - into plants such as linseed and oil seed rape. It could boost the omega 3 in a single portion of chicken breast to a
third of an adult's weekly need without it tasting fishy. ..... Prof Johnathan Napier, of
Rothamsted Research, said: 'We're three to five years away from something which could be
grown in a field.' Prof Judy Buttriss, of the British Nutrition Foundation, said: 'If we
don't get this sorted we're going to have massive health bills.'"
GM fish oil crops may be fed to chickens
Mirror,
16 November 2007
"In recent years, trans-fats have
risen to the top of the food-and-health agenda. A number of studies have linked trans-fats
to coronary heart disease and, as a consequence, food manufacturers, governments and
consumers are increasingly concerned about trans-fats..... About 100 years ago the
discovery was made that liquid oils could be converted to solid fats (which were more
useful in food manufacture) by a procedure called hydrogenation. As hydrogen was added to
liquid unsaturated oil it gradually became a solid saturated fat (also called a
hydrogenated fat). After the Second World War the process for making hydrogenated and
hardened fats from cheaper sources of vegetable oils was widely adopted. Margarines were developed and marketed as alternatives to butter, and vegetable shortenings increasingly replaced the animal fats in
cooking..... It is now generally accepted that
trans-fats are actually worse for the health than the saturated animal fats they were
designed to replace....The artificial hardening of
vegetable oils by hydrogenation would have been fine were it not for the fact that some of
the kinks unexpectedly change shape during the process and form unhardened trans-fats, which
cannot be properly digested by the body.... The simplest advice in the absence of any
specific labelling is to avoid all foods that list hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated
fats or shortenings on their labels. When cooking at home use liquid vegetable oil for
frying and only margarines and shortenings that are labelled trans-fat free.... as we now
know that they are not digested normally we should avoid eating them if possible....Initial concern was first raised in the UK as early as the 1970s
and further scientific research was needed to substantiate these early worries.... Modern margarine processing does not now produce trans-fats "
Trans-fats - Prof Tony Blake
BBC Online, July 2007
"Dr. Walter Willett, chairman of the
Department of Nutrition at the Harvard University School of Public Health, praised New
York health officials for considering a ban, which he said could save lives. 'Artificial trans fats are very toxic, and they almost surely
causes tens of thousands of premature deaths each year,' he said. 'The federal government should have done this long ago.'"
NYC Health Department Proposes Ban on Trans Fats
Associated Press, 27
September 2006
"The
FDA has stated that there is no room in a healthy diet for any level of trans fata fat found in partially hydrogenated oils that raises bad
cholesterol and lowers good cholesterol, thereby contributing to heart disease....
Monsanto and DuPont (Wilmington, DE, USA) are working on products that blend conventional
breeding and genetic engineering to produce soybean oils that have even healthier fat profiles and that
can be used for different applications, such as baking, frying and processing..... DuPont,
for example, has a transgenic high-oleic-acid soybean making its way through regulation now."
Functional foods from biotechan unappetizing prospect?
Nature Biotechnology 25, 525 - 531 (2007)
"The real bright prospect for GM is to
produce varieties that could provide immunity to a disease or improve the health
characteristics of traditional food, like canola oil with high-beta carotene content or
vitamin A supplemented rice. This 3rd generation of GM called nutraceuticals or 'functional foods' is
designed to produce medicinal qualities and/or food supplements within the plant."
Economic Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops on the Agri-Food Sector
European Commission,
Working Document Revision 2
".....functional food GM traits are
taking longer to see the light of day than the 'rosiest projections'of ten years ago. The
more complicated traits usually involve synthesis pathways to make or increase a nutrient,
and using multiple enzyme genes can also shift the
makeup of a food in unintended ways. In other words, such traits may require metabolic
engineering to find ways to increase a desired nutrient without a concomitant decrease in
other desirables or increase of unwanted by-products.....
"
Functional foods from biotechan unappetizing prospect?
Nature Biotechnology 25, 525 - 531 (2007)
In This Bulletin |
Margarine 'Good', GM Foods 'Good' |
The Trans Fats Blunder |
'GM Crops Are The Only Way To Solve Britons Diet Failings, Say Scientists' |
Is Resistance Or The Technology Futile? |
Margarine 'Good', GM Foods 'Good'
November 2007
Remember the days when you were told margarine was good for you? Then it was discovered ('oops'), that trans-fats (common in margarines) were actually
bad for you. For some the result was premature death.
Nutritional advice from scientists comes with its own risk of being based on partial knowledge. Until now, however, at least those risks have been
contained to a great degree by the properties of most basic foods remaining largely unchanged over time.
It's still quite easy for everyone to chose own their own dietary regime without the nutritional goal posts moving too drastically, especially in the
case of unprocessed foods.
But all that could be about to change if genetic engineers have their way.
Struggling to win public acceptance for GM foods genetic engineers are scratching around with their 'solutions in search of a problem' in order to
try and break the impasse.
Omega-3 acids are the latest ruse (see below).
The proposal to genetically engineer omega-3 acids into foods represents only the latest example in the thin end of the sharpest of wedges. Whether
or not this particular proposal turns out to be 'a good thing' if permitted, its adoption would be likely to open the sluice gates to the wholesale
reconfiguration of the world food supply at the most basic molecular level.
We can then expect 'boffins' to begin turning upside down the nutritional profiles of basic food stuffs based on 'best current advice'.
But on margarine they got the best scientific advice embarrassingly wrong. Far from preventing heart attacks, consuming margarine actually increased
the risk of them. It took decades before this reality finally came to the surface. Meanwhile a global multi-billion dollar processed foods industry
had been built on the back of this 'scientific' understanding.Because it is such a powerful tool, it is inevitable that the genetic engineering of food for nutritional purposes will raise the stakes in this
area immeasurably. The scope for rapidly and radically changing the nutritional profile of our foods is almost infinite. The properties of the
apple you eat one year will be different to the properties of the apple you ate the previous year, and so on and so on, endlessly into the future.
At some point, if we pursue this route, our staple foods will have had so much 'plastic surgery' that returning to the original foods (with which,
unlike the GE versions, we have co-evolved over thousands of years) will be impossible. The co-evolutionary link with our food supply will have been
irreparably broken.And who will decide all this? Certainly not you.
Under this scenario, the obesity epidemic (itself not fully understood by science) may then be one of the least of our food health problems.
It's one thing to try and get trans-fats out of margarine once you've discovered your nutritional advice to consumers was flawed. But try removing
retrospectively unwanted material once it has been embedded at the molecular level throughout the food chain and into its most basic resource - crop
seeds.
The combination of hubristic scientists armed with the 'nuclear option' of nutritional warfare (genetic engineering), together with the short-term
commercial greed of the agribusiness sector, may prove to be the ultimate recipe for food-chain breakdown from which there is no recovery.
The omega-3 'temptation' represents a major Trojan horse threat to humanity's food supply. How many are going to be taken in by it?
In the past opportunities to create novel foods such as margarine were limited. But with genetic engineering the opportunities are endless.
Who is going to take responsibility for the consequences?
NLPWESSEX
www.nlpwessex.org
"Fat is making headlines again. In a recent study, Harvard researchers confirmed what's been
suspected for some time--that a little trans fat goes a long way toward increasing your
risk of heart disease. ...... Hydrogenated
fats have become nearly ubiquitous in our food supply, used
in everything from margarines, shortenings (e.g. Crisco), crackers, cookies, baked goods
and peanut butter, to fast foods and even some soups, beans and cereals. In the Harvard study, a long-term look at the eating habits of more than
80,000 nurses found that those with the most trans fats in their diets had the highest
risk of heart disease--regardless of their total fat intake. The researchers then
estimated that cuting back on trans fats (by about four grams a day in the study) could
slash the risk of heart disease in half."
What to make of recent news that butter is better than margarine
Environmental
Nutrition, Jan, 1998 - Click Here
"Three years after the [New York] city
banned smoking in restaurants, health officials are talking about prohibiting something
they say is almost as bad: artificial trans fatty acids. The city health department
unveiled a proposal Tuesday that would bar cooks at any of the city's 24,600 food service
establishments from using ingredients that contain the artery-clogging substance, commonly
listed on food labels as partially hydrogenated oil. Artificial trans fats are found in
some shortenings, margarine and frying oils and turn up in foods from pie crusts to french
fries to doughnuts. Doctors agree that trans fats are
unhealthy in nearly any amount.....Under the New
York proposal, restaurants would need to get artificial trans fats out of cooking oils,
margarine and shortening by July 1, 2007, and all other foodstuffs by July 1, 2008. It
would not affect grocery stores. It also would not apply to naturally occurring trans
fats, which are found in some meats and dairy..... The U.S. Food and Drug Administration
began requiring food labels to list trans fats in January.Dr. Walter Willett, chairman of
the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard University School of Public Health, praised New
York health officials for considering a ban, which he said could save lives. 'Artificial trans fats are very toxic, and they almost surely
causes tens of thousands of premature deaths each year,' he said. 'The federal government should have done this long ago.'"
NYC Health Department Proposes Ban on Trans Fats
Associated Press, 27
September 2006
'GM Crops Are The Only Way To Solve Britons Diet Failings, Say Scientists'
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article2879567.ece From The Times November 16, 2007 GM crops are the only way to solve Britons diet failings, say scientists Mark Henderson, Science Editor Genetically modified crops will be the only sustainable way of solving Britains dietary shortcomings, scientists claim. Barely one in four British adults consumes close to the recommended quantities of critical omega3 fatty acids found chiefly in oily fish. Genetic engineering is the sole practical means of getting more of them into the food chain without damaging fragile fish stocks, researchers said. Two long-chain omega3 acids, EPA and DHA, are known to play important roles in health, protecting against heart disease, diabetes and hypertension and promoting the growth of brain cells in the young. Both acids, however, are produced only by algae and reach the human body through the fish that eat them, or from meat, milk or eggs from animals reared at least partly on fish meal. Raising dietary levels of the nutrients would thus place further pressure on fisheries that are already under threat. Crops enhanced with genes from algae, however, can make DHA and EPA. These can then be used as feed to boost the quantities found in chicken and other animal products. Experimental GM linseed and oilseed rape have been produced at Rothamsted Research, in Hertfordshire, which expects to seek regulatory approval for commercial use within three to five years. In the longer term, it may be possible to produce GM crops with omega3 acids that could be eaten directly, allowing vegetarians to benefit from the nutrients that are usually almost absent from their diets. Professor Johnathan Napier, who leads the Rothamsted team, said that GM was the only way of making DHA and EPA in crops, because the genes that allow their synthesis existed only in marine micro-algae. Thats why we have to take the GM route. There is no alternative, he said. We cant use mutagenesis or conventional breeding the genes arent there in crop plants in the first place. While the Government recommends consuming 450mg of the acids daily, average consumption is only 244mg, according to research by the European Union Lipgene project, which is investigating links between nutrition and cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Most peoples intake falls well below even this level, as 70 per cent of British adults never eat oily fish, such as salmon, mackerel, herring and fresh tuna. The problem could be addressed if people were to eat a portion of oily fish each week, through supplements or through chicken and other meat that has been enhanced with DHA and EPA. In each case, however, the acids would have to come ultimately from wild fish, placing unsustainable pressure on fisheries. Farmed fish are no solution, as they are fed on fish meal and oil that comes from wild sources. Lipgene research has indicated that people are open to accepting GM technology if it has clear nutritional and environmental benefits. There has been a lot of concern and resistance about GM technology in the food chain, but things can change, said Professor Ian Givens, of the Nutritional Sciences Research Unit at the University of Reading. When the issue about sustainability of fish oils becomes clearer and people can see more clearly what the benefits are from this sort of approach, I suspect mindsets will change. Professor Judy Buttriss, of the British Nutrition Foundation, said: The project has looked at consumer attitudes to GM, and we were quite surprised to see that there was openness when people could see benefits for themselves and their families. Professor Napier said: There isnt an alternative to this. The question is, where are you going to source these fatty acids if your only source is in decline and unsustainable. You cant just be a naysayer. Oiling the wheels There are two long-chain, polyunsaturated omega3 fatty acids that play important roles in human health: eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) Both reach the human food chain only through oily fish, such as salmon, mackerel, herring and fresh tuna. Canned tuna is low in the acids. The fatty acids are created originally by marine algae, which are then eaten by fish Research has established firmly that EPA and DHA protect against conditions such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure, which together are known as metabolic syndrome DHA is also involved in brain development, in the formation of nerve cells during the last trimester of pregnancy in the first year of life. Some evidence also suggests that it protects against cognitive decline and dementia in the elderly Official recommendations are for adults to consume 450mg of the acids daily, the equivalent of a portion of oily fish once a week. The average intake in Britain is only 244mg, and most people consume much less than this as 70 per cent of the population do not eat oily fish Source: Lipgene |
Is Resistance Or The Technology Futile?
Compounding The Errors
"There
was a time when the Western diet included plenty of omega-3 fatty acids naturally, as they bioaccumulated in livestock grazing on a wide variety of plants.
Modern agriculture, however, has obliterated this with the practice of fattening cattle in
feedlots on primarily corn and hay. In many cases, modern
breeding has selected for yield at the detriment of nutritional value and has created a need to add back nutrients somewhere...."
Functional foods from biotechan unappetizing prospect?
Nature Biotechnology 25, 525 - 531 (2007)
"Even in the United States, it seems
that GM foods have lost ground in consumer opinion polls..........functional food GM
traits are taking longer to see the light of day than the 'rosiest projections'of ten
years ago. The more complicated traits usually involve synthesis pathways to make or
increase a nutrient, and using multiple enzyme genes
can also shift the makeup of a food in unintended ways. In other words, such traits may
require metabolic engineering to find ways to increase a desired nutrient without a
concomitant decrease in other desirables or increase of unwanted by-products..... For commercially biofortified products, Beachy says the only pull
large enough to override GM food concerns is a government mandate to improve health. Just
such a mandate kickstarted the one type of GM functional food that is moving forward
through development. The FDA has stated that there is
no room in a healthy diet for any level of trans fata
fat found in partially hydrogenated oils that raises bad cholesterol and lowers good
cholesterol, thereby contributing to heart disease. Beginning in January 2006, the FDA
required all food nutrition labels to list the amount of trans fat. And in December 2006 and February 2007, New York City and
Philadelphia, respectively, banned the use of trans fat in the cities restaurants, a step that numerous other locales are pondering as well, including
Calgary, Boston and the state of California.... Monsanto and DuPont (Wilmington, DE, USA)
are working on products that blend conventional breeding and genetic
engineering to produce soybean oils that have even
healthier fat profiles and that can be used for different applications, such as baking,
frying and processing..... DuPont, for example, has a
transgenic high-oleic-acid soybean making its way
through regulation now. Oil from this product would have a higher stability for frying
foods. And a third-generation product, a high-oleic-acid, high-steric-acid oil, could be
used in baked goodsyes, even donuts. Similarly, Monsantos Vistive3 soybean,
currently in laboratory testing, combines three traits: low-lin, high-oleic and lower
saturated fats. Timothy Conner, senior director of oil seeds and food technology at
Monsanto, says he expects the company to launch Vistive3
sometime early in the next decade. Both companies are
also pursuing GM soybeans that have omega-3 essential fatty acids added, recognizing that a demand already exists for an inexpensive and
sustainable source of omega-3s...... The companies are also banking on both their
expertise in guiding GM soybeans through regulation and consumers recognition of the
health benefits of omega-3s....."
Functional foods from biotechan unappetizing prospect?
Nature Biotechnology 25, 525 - 531 (2007)
'Genetic Roulette' - The Documented Health Risks of
Genetically Engineered Foods - Click Here
GM Food Health Risks - Summary - Click
Here
Will GM Crops Deliver Benefits To Farmers? - Click Here
The Acceptable Face Of Ag-biotech - Click Here
Another
Suspect In Ballooning World Health Problem Microwave Ovens And The Obesity Epidemic www.nlpwessex.org/docs/microwaveobesity.htm September 2007 |
NLPWESSEX,
natural law publishing |